Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click here to nominate an item for In the news. In the news toolbox
Shortcut

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

José Mujica in 2009
José Mujica

view — page history — related changes — edit

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
Shortcut
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
Shortcut
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

Sections

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.

May 16

[edit]
May 16, 2025 (2025-05-16) (Friday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

May 15

[edit]
May 15, 2025 (2025-05-15) (Thursday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: Bachtiar Basri

[edit]
Article: Bachtiar Basri (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://lampungpro.co/news/wakil-gubernur-lampung-2014-2019-bachtiar-basri-meninggal-dunia-dimakamkan-di-kotabumi-
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Lampung deputy governor. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 11:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support article is good to go. Sahaib (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no citation for date of birth. Also, the footnote for the entire early life and education section as well as the first two paragraphs of the career section is not actually to a 'biography', despite it being described as such. Rather, it is actually to an unusual "biodata" PDF whose origin and reliability seems unclear to me. In any event, the biodata form does not provide support for any of the many claims made. Needs work. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 23:24, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's from a government website. Try to translate the title of the website before commenting on the origins or reliability. If that's your main concern, there are several articles that I could offer as a substitute; I'll fix it shortly. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 23:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Robert Walls

[edit]
Article: Robert Walls (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-15/carlton-premiership-player-and-coach-robert-walls-dies-aged-74/105295562
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian football player, coach, and commentator. HiLo48 (talk) 02:57, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose there are some statements in the article that cited Wikipedia Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 11:53, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 14

[edit]
May 14, 2025 (2025-05-14) (Wednesday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: Daniel Bilalian

[edit]
Article: Daniel Bilalian (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Parisien, Le Monde
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: French journalist and television presenter. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 13

[edit]
May 13, 2025 (2025-05-13) (Tuesday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports

RD: Joe Don Baker

[edit]
Article: Joe Don Baker (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hollywood Reporter Legacy.com
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American actor with some high-profile roles. Death was on the 7th but first reports of it seem to be on this date (and now only getting to major sources). Article has usual problems for actors, as well as lacking more info on his death. Masem (t) 12:04, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A lot of uncited statements Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 12:29, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Rich Rollins

[edit]
Article: Rich Rollins (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Sports Illustrated
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 240F:7A:6253:1:281A:3BBE:CB81:2EAD (talk) 04:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - Article is very sufficent and looks good. 2600:1009:B198:E357:1A37:9126:4960:16D1 (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Divaldo Franco

[edit]
Article: Divaldo Franco (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): G1
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 ArionStar (talk) 19:31, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is well-sourced and of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mali political crisis

[edit]
Article: List of political parties in Mali (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Interim President of Mali, General Assimi Goita, dissolves all political parties. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera, BBC, DW.
Credits:

 --Panam2014 (talk) 17:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support on notability, but this really should have its own article Kowal2701 (talk) 20:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose The event described does not have an article. The dissolution is not discussed in any of the articles linked in the blurb (save for literally the five-word sentence, "On 13 May 2025, Goïta dissolves all political parties" in the Goita article). There needs to be a valid target article which will be bolded. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 20:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment a standalone article is not a requirement for ITN, just that there is an updated article. Per WP:ITNUPDATE, the decision as to when an article is updated enough is subjective, but a five-sentence update (with at minimum three references, not counting duplicates) is generally more than sufficient, while a one-sentence update is highly questionable. Natg 19 (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment According to One-party state, Mali has been here before from 1960–68 and 1976-91. The current junta was already failing to hold elections and this decree is an extension of its tyranny. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: this sounds significant, but there's no prose description of these events in any of the linked articles, so nothing for us to assess. If it's an update to an existing article, there needs to be at least a full paragraph of referenced prose describing the events, supported by references. If it's a new article, more like three paragraphs to avoid being a stub. Articles should be updated before making an ITN nomination. Modest Genius talk 11:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability and quality, I added a two-paragraph section (List of political parties in Mali#Dissolution) detailing the context and the changes themselves. I hope this is enough of an update for posting. The orange tag is still a bit of an issue, although it doesn't pertain to the updated section. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Richard Garwin

[edit]
Article: Richard Garwin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American physicist. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait Odd extended quote from a book that I am not knowledgeable enough to correct. Bremps... 03:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted blurb) Blurb/RD: José Mujica

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: José Mujica (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Former president of Uruguay José Mujica (pictured) dies at the age of 89. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Influential former President of Uruguay, arguably an influential South American politician in the 2010s. International obits already being published. Article in decent shape. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as RD: The article is in good shape, but he's not big enough for a blurb. He's nowhere near the international significance of Pope Francis, a recent death that merited a blurb. Cambalachero (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Big enough. A major political figure in Latin America, called the "poorest president in the world". ArionStar (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Article looks good. Major political figure in his region as well as his nation. Passed several major reforms in Uruguay during his tenure. Ornithoptera (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Notable enough for blurb. Sahaib (talk) 21:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Notable enough; he was a major political figure in Latin America. Cocu15 (talk) 21:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb A household name for people around the world, especially due to his humility. I've heard his name many times in sermons and motivational seminars. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 22:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • For those recommending a blurb, the article is very weak in explaining how he merits being considered a major figure. There are details scattered around but there should be a dedicated section that a reader can immediately be drawn to to understand that. Obits now may be able to flesh that out. Otherwise as it stands, I am not convinced he was a major figure to qualify for a blurb, as just being a former leader is not sufficient for that. Masem (t) 22:15, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Is this a comment or was this supposed to be a "Support RD"? Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 02:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    For all purpose, yes, the basic RD support is there as the normal quality is met. I just don't like that to a reader coming to the page that his significance as a major figure is something not glaring clear and instead diluted through the article. Masem (t) 13:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb You may have to read the whole article to kind of understand the influence, but I don't feel that (if an "impact and legacy"-esque section doesn't evolve naturally, which it might, especially with obits) we should be summarising articles within themselves just so people clicking through from the main page don't have to read the whole thing. Kingsif (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb. The article is in good condition; it only has one citation needed tag. Flibirigit (talk) 01:09, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb - Notable indeed and worthy of a blurb. Article could be more comprehensive but is good enough at this time for the Front page, in my view. Decently written and cited. Jusdafax (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted blurb, but image protection still hasn't kicked in after 30 minutes. Schwede66 04:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull, consensus is that old politicians dying when they are out of office shouldn't get blurbs. Also, this discussion wasn't given enough time for editors to weigh in. Abductive (reasoning) 09:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There is no such consensus. Jiang Zemin, Mikhail Gorbachev, Jimmy Carter, Benito Aquino, George Bush, Sr., even Henry Kissinger who was not head of state, former Greece King, all got posted. Probably there were even more whom I can't remember immediately. BilboBeggins (talk) 09:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Please provide the link on the claimed consensus and/or the discussion that led to it Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 10:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Post-posting support blurb. Seems notable and famous enough for posting, 84 wiki pages. BilboBeggins (talk) 09:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support blurb - Mujica's death made the BBC News homepage, which strongly suggests to me that his significance is more than merely local or regional. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I still have not seen, in the article, in this discussion, or in news articles themselves, anything that makes him so internationally significant to deserve a blurb rather than just a RD. Significant, yes: he was a president, he was popular in his home country, he did some stuff as president, he held diplomatic relations with his neighbors, some people said nice things about him... but what else? And with all due respect to Uruguay, he's not even the president of a significant country, such as those in the G20. Cambalachero (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I guess nickname the world's poorest president makes him standout. BilboBeggins (talk) 15:14, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A nickname? Big deal. All presidents have one. Again, what else? Cambalachero (talk) 15:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose pull This is not big news -- only 36K views yesterday -- but he's an interesting subject. And the priority for me is keeping ITN fresh. The blurb which would be reinstated is the Kentucky Derby. That was already over a week stale and it would be disrespectful to pull this for a horse race. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The Uruguayan government held three days of national mourning between May 14th and May 16th, and his state funeral, which included a funeral procession. 2409:4085:2D8F:5433:8088:B9F6:A745:64AE (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That doesn't seem a strong argument. There are always new news stories, ITN is always "fresh". Cambalachero (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The previous blurb was the Pope and that was 6 days ago. That's not "fresh". Andrew🐉(talk) 14:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We can't force news to happen. Most of the major stories going on are either tied to existing ongoing or related to politics, which we have termined are not great ITN without clear sign of a larger impact (like the tariffs and trade war onset). Eg the media is obsessed with Trump taking the plane from Qatar but that's not really ITN material. Masem (t) 14:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And yet you support a blurb about the death of a politician, and my request of clarifications about his impact is still unanswered. Cambalachero (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No, Masem did not. BilboBeggins (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    To be clear I didn't support posting in its current state - it should be crystal clear of someone's impact or legacy from sourced content in at least a few paragraphs within the article. I think there was some potential for that in this case but as of now the reader has to read through and pick that up from disparate parts of the article to see that. Masem (t) 17:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    News is always happening, the news that passes through the gatekeeping of ITNC however is less regular. nableezy - 17:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There's usually plenty of news. To confirm this just look at the Portal:Current events links – this day's has over 10 bullet points. The portal is productive because it doesn't have the same level of obstructive gatekeeping as ITN. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That portal doesn't have to worry about article quality. Masem (t) 16:15, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The new Pope was posted in just an hour at ITN while his article was the subject of intense activity of very variable quality. Speed was obviously the priority in that case; not quality. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support to counteract those trying to pull. I think he is significant enough to keep the blurb. --SpectralIon 16:38, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    An explanation of why you think he's so significant would be more useful than a mere vote. I would have no problem to change to support if someone bothered to point some significant impact of his presidency that I may have overlooked. Cambalachero (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
His govt legalized abortion, legalized marijuana, legalized same-sex marriage -- all in Catholic Latin America. I've just added a paragraph on those progressive policies (and others) to the intro in the hope of underscoring his impact (they were all in there but, yes, somewhat dispersed). Moscow Mule (talk) 06:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All that seems a bit too little and inconsequential to me (in Argentina, Alfonsín sent the heads of the military junta to trial, Menem and Milei solved two hyperinflation processes; that's a bit more of an impact than just getting some people to raise hands and pass a bill), but I can see why readers with lower standards would think that's important. Changed to support the blurb. Cambalachero (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The readership spiked high enough to put the subject in the top 10 for yesterday – up there with the Pope and Pete Rose. This is evidence that the story has generated good coverage and interest. If it works, don't fix it. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, posting an article at the top of Wikipedia's front page will send large amounts of traffic to that article. Is that what you're saying? Celjski Grad (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Only some of those views will come from ITN. For example, most of the views come from the mobile view, not the desktop view and ITN is not at the top of that – it's way down below DYK. But either way, attracting lots of readers is a good thing. The staler topics at ITN like Merz or the snooker, are getting comparatively few readers now. ITN should feature fresh content about topics which are currently in the news. Stale stuff which has been run for a week or more doesn't work so well. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Kit Bond

[edit]
Article: Kit Bond (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://governor.mo.gov/press-releases/archive/governor-kehoe-statement-passing-former-us-senator-and-governor-christopher
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American politician. Article needs some citations. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose still needs work on some of the uncited statements Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 08:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Soft support/almost ready I think the article is actually generally well-referenced, with two exceptions: (1) the committee assignments subsection is unreferenced and (2) the electoral results section is unreferenced. I can try to work on that later today or tomorrow, if it is still unresolved. In any event, that information is certainly publicly available, and I think the article is close to ready. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 23:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Eddie Marzuki Nalapraya

[edit]
Article: Eddie Marzuki Nalapraya (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7912252/eks-wagub-jakarta-eddie-nalapraya-meninggal-pramono-rano-melayat
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Jakarta deputy governor Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 08:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is well-sourced and of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:48, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support article is fine. Sahaib (talk) 11:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Soft oppose I have orange-tagged one of the sections for NPOV issues - it uses language that borders on outwardly promotional. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 23:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Executive Order on Prescription Drug Pricing to Americans

[edit]
Good faith posting, but WP:SNOW closing. This is absolutely certain to never be posted. See also: this essay. (non-admin closure) -- RockstoneSend me a message! 05:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed image
Article: Executive Order on Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Donald J Trump revives executive order for most favored nation drug pricing (Post)
News source(s): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Nominator's comments: Highly publicized new development that people are likely to want clarification on Czarking0 (talk) 05:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely not, and this shouldn't even have an article. It's a big nothingburger. As of yet, it's just a direction to agencies to request things. If it were a mandate, it would almost certainly be overturned in the courts. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 05:15, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

May 12

[edit]
May 12, 2025 (2025-05-12) (Monday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Albanian parliamentary election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Albanian parliamentary election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Socialist Party led by current Prime Minister Edi Rama (pictured) wins an ouright majority in the Albanian parliamentary election. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Preliminary results are in and looks like a foregone conclusion. Abcmaxx (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose on quality as there are multiple issues with the article. Firstly, there are swathes of unreferenced text. Secondly, the 'Results' section has no prose. Thirdly, the 'Results by county' sub-section contains an empty table. Fourthly, there is nothing about the post-election reactions from politicians and observers. The article has way to go before posting.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:06, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality as there's a lot of unreferenced text and no prose in the Results section. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 12:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It's proven to be a rigged unfair election anyway with lots of new scandalous updates still coming out. Matete Plays (talk) 12:35, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready. The material in the article seems fine, though could do with some copyediting. However, there is no prose whatsoever in the 'results' section or explaining the outcome, and the 'Results by county' table is empty. That needs to be filled out and at least a full paragraph of referenced prose added to the results section. Modest Genius talk 12:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sharpe James

[edit]
Article: Sharpe James (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American politician. Former mayor of Newark, New Jersey Thriley (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) China–United States trade war de-escalation

[edit]
Editors think that Trump policies are too volatile to be suitable for ITN. Schwede66 18:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Articles: China–United States trade war (talk · history · tag) and Tariffs in the second Trump administration (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ China and the USA make mutual tariff reductions to de-escalate their trade war. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYT
Credits:
Nominator's comments: This is like a ceasefire in a hot war and seems quite a significant withdrawal from the precipice. What the final outcome will be is still uncertain but so it goes... Andrew🐉(talk) 11:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, anything that this White House does is prone to massive and total reversals at the drop of a hat, so there’s no real point in posting anything policy-wise that they announce short of a declaration of war or launching an internal self-coup. RPH (talk) 11:44, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Its a 90 day pause. Not yet permanent. And unlike a combat situation ceasefire where we can tell if things are changed immediately, the impact of a pause in overseas trade will take weeks to see. Masem (t) 12:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem. TwistedAxe [contact] 14:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Good faith, but tariff rates from this administration are too volatile for us to post something like a temporary reduction to massive tariffs that he himself put in place just a few weeks ago. A few months from now, the massive tariffs on not only China but also the entire rest of the world will all be unpaused, and who knows whether he'll keep them, scrap them all permanently, or raise them even higher.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 14:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. We can't post every change in tariffs that Trump introduces / cancels / changes after a few days, especially in deals with individual countries. A lot of the US-UK tariffs were just removed or reduced by a new deal a few days ago, and I wouldn't expect that to be in ITN. Besides, this is removing a barrier that Trump himself introduced just a few weeks ago; it's performative politics designed to generate headlines not make sensible economic policy. Modest Genius talk 14:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This might meet WP:TRUMPHATE and not everything trump does deserves to be put on ITN, only something really outrageous and will have reprecussions might be considered for ITN. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:F0CF:3A91:769A:29BB (talk) 17:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - given the track record so far, what comes up must go down. EF5 17:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) End of the Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency

[edit]
Article: Kurdistan Workers' Party insurgency (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Kurdistan Workers' Party announces it will disband, ending its insurgency against Turkey. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Kurdistan Workers' Party declares the end of its 46-year insurgency in Turkey, announcing its intent to dissolve
News source(s): Bloomberg News, Guardian
Credits:

 elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per all above, but I concur to wait until Modest Genius' objections have been dealt with to post. Departure– (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support on quality There are no more orange tags or CN tags, and the article has been significantly expanded. @Admins willing to post ITN: I change my vote and think this is ready. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 23:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as it's an event with historical consequences. Martianmister (talk) 21:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance and quality. There are a few inline citation needed tags, but no orange or red section tags, nor are any needed, so if I'm reading ITNCRIT correctly this is acceptable. For the humungous length of the article, it's in pretty decent shape sourcing-wise. Toadspike [Talk] 08:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Premature, it's an announcement but that is not formalized. 80.212.144.89 (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support End to a 46-year insurgency which killed tens of thousands of people.
  • Admin comment I've gone through the article and either deleted or hidden all unreferenced content. I've also protected a suitable image ("Female PKK guerrillas pictured"). However, the article is too thin on updates; there are a mere two sentences in the body and nothing in the lead. From my perspective, once that's been amended, this could get posted. Schwede66 20:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support—A major, long-running insurgency that has had a long-term and often destabilizing effect on the nation of Turkey is coming to an end. This is very significant news, and very worthy of a blurb. I agree with the consensus that the altblurb is preferable. I haven't reviewed the article's quality, but support for a blurb is always contingent upon adequate sourcing. Kurtis (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marked as Ready – Prevailing consensus to post, quality concerns have been met (a "2025 ceasefire" subsection has been created.) Hopefully this is not, yet again, a highly-notable event that gets forgotten to be posted. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 20:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Also added some more details and reactions. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 21:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 03:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 11

[edit]
May 11, 2025 (2025-05-11) (Sunday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: Arjun Menon (coach)

[edit]
Article: Arjun Menon (coach) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Straits Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Singaporean cricket coach. Died violently in foreign land. – robertsky (talk) 06:27, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is long enough with no missing citations. Bremps... 18:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2024–25 Basketball Champions League Winner

[edit]
This isn’t supported as a notable event by the editing community. Schwede66 18:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed image
Article: 2024–25 Basketball Champions League (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Unicaja (pictured celebrating) wins the 2024–25 Basketball Champions League. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.championsleague.basketball/en/news/final-four-mvp-carter-leads-unicaja-to-back-to-back-bcl-titles
Credits:

Article updated
 Mehman (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose along what Modest Genius said
Czarking0 (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Sabu

[edit]
Article: Sabu (wrestler) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Fox Sports Radio
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Lebanese-American professional wrestler, pioneer of hardcore wrestling  The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 10

[edit]
May 10, 2025 (2025-05-10) (Saturday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Politics and elections

Science and technology

(Posted) RD: Matthew Best (conductor)

[edit]
Article: Matthew Best (conductor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Telegraph
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English "teenage founder of the Corydon Singers and commanding Covent Garden bass", as the 13 May obit says, - there wasn't much of an article until that came, finally. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is well-cited and described the subject in a great detail. Very good condition. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 15:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: William Luers

[edit]
Article: William Luers (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is in a good condition; long enough. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 15:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Azmun Jaafar

[edit]
Article: Azmun Jaafar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.detik.com/sumut/berita/d-7907961/kabar-duka-bupati-pertama-pelalawan-wafat
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indonesian local politician. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 04:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Koyo Kouoh

[edit]
Article: Koyo Kouoh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article in good shape. Abcmaxx (talk) 21:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bob Cowper

[edit]
Article: Bob Cowper (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-11/australian-cricket-bob-cowper-dies-age-84/105279410
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian Test cricketer HiLo48 (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was NOT unreferenced. In fact, there is a note immediately following it that says "the source at the bottom of the infobox deals with this", which it does. However, to make it more obvious, I've added a source direct to the birth date and place. HiLo48 (talk) 08:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the unsourced content. It added nothing to the article. HiLo48 (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Kosmos-482

[edit]
(non-admin close) This would never be posted due to the non-conclusive evidence. This would also not match ITN/R and will also be closed due to WP:SNOW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:9400:98a0:92a0:414b:940b:9475:8185 (talk) 16:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article: Kosmos 482 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A 1970s failed Venus probe from the Soviet Union named "Kosmos 482" re-enters the earth's atmosphere, landing west of the island of Java in the Indian Ocean. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Kosmos 482 lands in a part of the Indian Ocean, west of the city of Jakarta, Indonesia, after losing its tracking over Germany.
Alternative blurb II: ​ A failed Venus probe enters the earth's atmosphere over India, landing west of Jakarta, Indonesia, in the eastern Indian Ocean
News source(s): (NBC News) (Live Science) (European Space Agency) (AP News)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Long anticipated crash landing, considering back in 1972 and 1981, many pieces of the main bus of this probe fell back into earth. a few in 1972, and others in around 1978-1981. There is still ongoing coverage of this probe after it fell. Passes WP:N because of this, it has had coverage before the event and after the event. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:C4D9:BD2C:F4D8:E357 (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]
Strong oppose as apparently unimportant. Departure– (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I personally think it's really cool that a failed 50 year old probe just reentered the atmosphere, but in reality, it just crashed harmlessly into the ocean. I'd say this is good faith, but it's not very important, nor did it have an effect on anything. qw3rty 22:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support original blurb Interesting event getting coverage that would help diversify ITN. An argument could be made that this is DYK and not ITN but I would personally like to see this posted. The article is in good shape. I also fixed the grammar of the original blurb. --SpectralIon 03:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work It seems that the location is based on estimates rather than observation and different authorities have different theories. See Location After Reentry Baffling Watchers. The article likewise says that the location is not confirmed. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:11, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Misleading blurbs The alt blurbs read as if the probe landed sofly somewhere on the island of Java, near Jakarta. The original blurb sounds more correct, although too wordy. Besides that, weak oppose in terms of notability - no damage and no injuries; besides, space junk crashes frequently on Earth. Khuft (talk) 13:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality. The article really glosses over how this mission failed. Its interesting about it finally reentering the atmosphere and crash, but the article needs to properly reflect the whole mission. Masem (t) 17:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Per Atmospheric entry#Uncontrolled and unprotected entries stuff enters the atmosphere every day. While this is more significant then most space garage, it is not significant enough to be worth mentioning. Perhaps If the lander was found, but it was not and probably will not be. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    we have the technology to go underwater, we might be able to find it Shaneapickle (talk) 21:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
strong support If launches are important and posted, so is the other side.Sportsnut24 (talk) 06:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ITN does not post every space launch. Modest Genius talk 13:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It came down roughly when predicted and fell into the ocean. There was no damage and no hardware has been recovered. This was a mildly diverting story for a few days, but will quickly be forgotten. This would make a nice DYK if the article can be sufficiently expanded (or brought to GA standard), but it's not significant enough for an ITN blurb. Modest Genius talk 13:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose One probe not a significant dent on this lot? And no significant dent on anything when it landed... Martinevans123 (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This would be a good DYK, but isn't significant enough to be ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's been over a week since creation so unless we can get this article to 70,000 bytes within the next few days (current size 17,000 bytes) or to GA quality it won't find itself at DYK. Departure– (talk) 14:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Snow close Not going to be posted. Bremps... 21:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

India–Pakistan ceasefire

[edit]
Article: 2025 India–Pakistan standoff (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ India and Pakistan agree to a full and immediate ceasefire after days of conflict. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Conflict appears to have ended. Full ceasefire. Johndavies837 (talk) 13:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Support. Wasn't expecting a ceasefire after just a few days, but y'know. — EF5 13:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Nfitz, article quality is not sufficient for ITN. Also, the ceasefire has seemingly ceased. [1] --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, it has been broken. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:03, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support on notability, as the sole blurb needed for the conflict as the previous one was pulled per ERRORS. The ceasefire's shaky, yes, but per Al-Jazeera the ceasefire has been agreed to by both sides and the "explosions" appear routine and nothing's happened since then; this is akin to what Israel calls a ceasefire, and most of us rightfully have no problem posting those on their own merits. Oppose on quality, as the article that should be the target, 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, still has two orange tags. Departure– (talk) 01:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Reports indicate that both countries have already violated the ceasefire. This makes it about as credible as any ceasefire Israel makes. --SpectralIon 03:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait – More recent news indicates that the ceasefire still holds despite several violations (per CNN [2]), but those violations and wording from Indian officials indicate that the ceasefire is shaky at best. ArkHyena (they/any) 11:28, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Snow close Too many "oppose" votes. Bremps... 21:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The opposition isn't all on notability, though. Departure– (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 9

[edit]
May 9, 2025 (2025-05-09) (Friday)

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Sports

(Posted) RD: Simon Mann

[edit]
Article: Simon Mann (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British mercenary and officer in the SAS. Death announced 9 May. Thriley (talk) 18:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Tom Farmer

[edit]
Article: Tom Farmer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Scottish businessman. Sahaib (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Margot Friedländer

[edit]
Article: Margot Friedländer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Deutsche Welle
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Holocaust survivor who was active as a public speaker in not forgetting, died at age 103. The article looks good and I am surprised that nobody brought it here yet. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Peter Morwood

[edit]
Article: Peter Morwood (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://locusmag.com/2025/05/peter-morwood-1956-2025/
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prolific fantasy novelist and screenwriter. Tacticnerd (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some work on the Bibliography part. Suggesting Tacticnerd to work it on in order for it to be posted for the mainpage. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 10:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The entire bibliography section is completely unreferenced. To be frank, I think the article would be in a post-worthy state (even if bordering on a stub) if that section were completely removed. The entire biography section is otherwise well-cited. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 23:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Douglas Gibson

[edit]
Article: Douglas Gibson (politician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.enca.com/news-top-stories/da-veteran-douglas-gibson-dies-aged-82
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: South African lawyer, politician and diplomat. Died today.  Lefcentreright  Discuss  16:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: David Souter

[edit]
Article: David Souter (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: US Supreme Court Justice P1(she/her, talk/contribs) 13:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates&oldid=1290676261"